WEBBE-B / WORKED EXAMPLES

Review a folder before cleanup

By Jisung Kim · Updated 2026-10-30 · Synthetic examples, not customer results

Use this workflow before deleting duplicate candidates or normalizing filenames. The aim is a reviewable inventory and proposed name map, not an automatic cleanup.

1. Reproduce the baseline

  1. Open File Audit Lab and select “Load reproducible demo”.
  2. Check 1,248 records across 42 folders. These records are synthetic metadata, not files uploaded by users.
  3. Review the 20 same-size candidate groups and 12 groups with matching demo hashes. Same size alone is not proof of identical contents.
  4. Download Inventory JSON and keep it as your before snapshot. CSV is useful for reading in a spreadsheet; JSON is the input for Snapshot Compare.

2. Interpret a collision

Consider two synthetic names in the same folder: Report A.txt and report-a.TXT. Lowercasing and converting spaces to hyphens maps both to report-a.txt. The preview must show a collision. Adding a sequence produces distinct proposed names, but a person still decides whether those names are meaningful.

3. Use your own folder

Select only a non-sensitive test folder first. Inventory selection reads metadata; the SHA-256 button reads candidate file contents locally. Keep the 256 MB guard unless you understand the browser memory cost. The application does not delete, move, or rename files. A downloaded rename map is a plan, not an executed change.

What this does not establish

Demo hashes are fixtures. They do not prove the contents of your files. An inventory is not a backup and does not establish that every file is readable or recoverable. A candidate duplicate may still be needed in both locations.

Next step

After making your own separately backed-up changes, export a new inventory and follow the snapshot comparison workflow. Read the hashing guide and collision guide before acting.


All workflows · Choose a tool · Report a reproducible issue